![]() ![]() That's true if we look strictly from CPU side. Yes, I know: 7950X finishes work faster (than 5950X) and so at the end, electricity bill will be lower. In sense: Make it faster, no matter the costs (power draw & heat dissipation). Because if IPC is the same, then I see 7950X as a "brute force" improvement. Now I wonder, how much has actual CPU improved (compared to 5950X)? I mean IPC. And quite a lot performance increase (in my opinion) goes to much higher clock speed -which in turn comes back as heat dissipation. Now, some of this performance increase happens thanks to faster new DDR5 memory. Ok, so you say (for example), 7950X is 15% faster (in whatever) than 5950X. again, that's my impression, so feel free to diagree. Are you trying to convince "gamers" to shell out 800€ for CPU alone? Yes, there's always said, that for gaming alone, it's "wiser" to get 7600X (or 5800X3D) -but such title still imply that 7950X is simply "the right thing". ![]() I assume, such title should grab the attention. When I see a CPU like 7900X/7950X (or Intel's pendant) in conjunction with "gaming", I can already imagine the content. so why bother.Īnother reason why I didn't read, is the title. I didn't read the article, simply because it's too long -quick view on some of pages gave me impression, that there's a lot of repeating from previous articles. Could Tom's have the list of motherboards from the 300-series chipsets that do support Ry5K? That would actually help track which partners are indeed reliable and can be trusted with buying into AM5. Plus, we all know which motherboard vendors actually followed through with the updates, so they'll get more sales once B650 launches. Maybe partners would rather convince you to buy a new motherboard, but allowing this "mix and match" with generations does help overall sales or so it is my impression. This being said, after AM4, I'd imagine both AMD and partners have seen it does matter they do keep supporting newer CPUs and see that as a strength. The huge caveat is you have to trust not only AMD, but the partners to go with it and roll the BIOS updates down the line. One small point that I won't really defend much, but buying into the AM5 platform, you buy into several years of support. I hope AMD can alleviate it a bit so they become more of a mainstream crowd fav. Good to see more reaffirmation these CPUs don't have a performance problem, but a platform cost (or "cost of entry") problem with them. Now it's time for a new socket, AM5, which AMD has committed to supporting through ‘2025+.’ AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (AMD Ryzen) at Amazon for $546.62ĪMD's socket AM4 has served for five years across five CPU generations, four architectures, four process nodes, 125+ processors, and 500+ motherboard designs.You also get support for 4K60 and hybrid graphics. The iGPU supports AV1 and VP9 decode, H.264 and HVEC encode and decode, USB Type-C with DisplayPort Alt Mode, DisplayPort 2.0 (adaptive sync, DSC, UHBR10, HDR), and HDMI 2.1 (HFR, 48Gbps FRL, DSC, HDR10+, and VRR). The integrated graphics do have appeal for troubleshooting and OEM systems, though, and it has a few other redeeming qualities. The bar charts don't do the poor results enough justice - check out the frametime over time charts for perspective on just how badly the iGPU performs in gaming. Much like Intel’s graphics, we were treated to a slideshow in the few games that did run. We couldn’t get Far Cry 6 to load, for instance, and Shadow of the Tomb Raider could render the benchmark at 1280x720 but wouldn’t run at 1080p. I can help to work on this if this is a feasible way to do.īeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.We tried a few games anyway, which you can see if you flip through the album above, and the results weren’t pretty. This is why I wondering if a zero-copy implementation can help in increasing the token generation t/s when I offload all layers to the integrated GPU. The CPU result I have tested is around 25t/s for pp 512 and 7t/s for tg128. Ggml_opencl: device FP16 support: true model ![]() Ggml_opencl: selecting device: 'Intel(R) Iris(R) Xe Graphics ' ![]() Ggml_opencl: selecting platform: 'Intel(R) OpenCL HD Graphics' The result I have gotten when I run llama-bench with different number of layer offloaded is as below: The hardware that I have used is Intel 11th Gen i7-11665G7, with dual channel memory installed. I am running llama.cpp on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |